Continue writing your Monograph/Tables
From Fallen London Wiki
| Depth of Historical Study | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Your monograph is still a work in progress. |
| 2 – 3 | You have enough material for a short paper. |
| 4 – 5 | You have enough material for a slim volume. |
| 6 – 7 | You have enough material for a long thesis. |
| Monograph: Cautionary | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | You have avoided inserting so-called 'cautionary advice' into your monograph. |
| 100 – 200 | Your monograph can't help but draw some lessons from the past. |
| 300 – 400 | Your monograph adds up to a cautionary tale. |
| 500 + | Your monograph is meant to shock the audience into learning something. |
| Monograph: Ironic | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | Your monograph is drier than a tomb-colonist's snuff-box. |
| 50 – 200 | You've let slip in slivers and barbs of irony. |
| 300 – 400 | Your monograph is quite ironic. |
| 500 + | Your monograph is very ironic, farcical event. Isn't all history? |
| Monograph: Tragic | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | Your monograph avoids melodrama. |
| 100 – 200 | Your monograph has some flashes of tragedy. |
| 300 – 400 | Your monograph builds to a tragic narrative. |
| 500 + | Your monograph's narrative is so tragic, it might as well have streamers of fake blood coming off the pages. |
| Monograph: Incoherence | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | You expect the incoherence of your monograph to not reduce its value at all. |
| 5+ | You expect the incoherence of your monograph to reduce its value by about (Incoherence)%. |