Maybe the sourcing <a href="/wiki/Volume_of_Collated_Research" title="Volume of Collated Research"><img alt="" src="/w/images/thumb/9/9b/Library.png/20px-Library.png" decoding="async" width="20" height="26" srcset="/w/images/thumb/9/9b/Library.png/30px-Library.png 1.5x, /w/images/thumb/9/9b/Library.png/40px-Library.png 2x" /></a> <a href="/wiki/Volume_of_Collated_Research" title="Volume of Collated Research">Volume of Collated Research</a> and <a href="/wiki/Correspondence_Plaque" title="Correspondence Plaque"><img alt="" src="/w/images/thumb/c/c2/Scrawl1.png/20px-Scrawl1.png" decoding="async" width="20" height="26" srcset="/w/images/thumb/c/c2/Scrawl1.png/30px-Scrawl1.png 1.5x, /w/images/thumb/c/c2/Scrawl1.png/40px-Scrawl1.png 2x" /></a> <a href="/wiki/Correspondence_Plaque" title="Correspondence Plaque">Correspondence Plaque</a> should be assessed in the Strategy, as easy as it is to write them off as Echo losses, the sourcing may drastically tank the EPA.