Forum:Ventures

Forums: Index > Archived topics > Ventures

Hello everyone. I'd like to discuss Ventures.

Initially I've had them all lumped in content pages, like Seduction: Honey-sipping heiress.

Question: Is it better to have them in categories, (and move the descriptions and stuff to the category page?) See Category:Seduction:_Honey-sipping_heiress.

What do you think? :) Let's all agree on one format, and change all the other venture pages to show that.

Neonix (talk) 02:28, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

I prefer the way it is now with content pages. It seems more structured than to just toss all the actions into a category.

Malgorath the Mad 02:50, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, the content pages are better. It gives one a better idea of how that story-line progresses. I would actually really like more pages like that, with more information than the category pages give.

Prequevu 22:34, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Prequevu. I think perhaps we should begin to order the stories in a way similar to the ventures. It would be easier to find the action in the story you are looking for.

Malgorath the Mad 23:33, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

I really appreciate your feedback, everyone! I'll work immediately on making a format for the Stories pages. You can help out by pointing out the 'stuff' that should go there. So far we have space for a description and a link to what unlocks it.. anything else?

Neonix (talk) 00:43, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

It seems that Ventures recently got a makeover, with a single storylet absorbing all possible actions. See Commission: Praising Fungus in Verse for an example, with its actions all available in Literary Ambitions. --Neonix (talk) 10:10, March 4, 2012 (UTC)