Editing Barristering at Evenlode (Guide)
From Fallen London Wiki
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 480: | Line 480: | ||
| Criminal Case | | Criminal Case | ||
| {{IL|Shadowy}} 175 | | {{IL|Shadowy}} 175 | ||
| − | | {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|- | + | | {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|- x}} |
| {{IL|Suspicion}} +3 CP | | {{IL|Suspicion}} +3 CP | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 602: | Line 602: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<References /> | <References /> | ||
| − | |||
==Strategy== | ==Strategy== | ||
| Line 612: | Line 611: | ||
#[[Enter the bare minimum]] or [[Drown them in paper]] | #[[Enter the bare minimum]] or [[Drown them in paper]] | ||
#[[Rely on a form of honour that came before laws]] | #[[Rely on a form of honour that came before laws]] | ||
| − | #[[Interrogate witnesses to the alleged act of (crime)]] | + | #[[Interrogate witnesses to the alleged act of (crime)]] |
#[[Close out your argument in a nuanced way]] | #[[Close out your argument in a nuanced way]] | ||
#Await the Verdict | #Await the Verdict | ||
| Line 621: | Line 620: | ||
#Start at 3 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | #Start at 3 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | ||
#[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | #[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | ||
| − | #Opening Statements | + | # Opening Statements |
| − | #*'''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] | + | #* '''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] |
| − | #*'''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] | + | #* '''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] |
#[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | #[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | ||
#[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | #[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | ||
| Line 641: | Line 640: | ||
#Start at 0 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | #Start at 0 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | ||
#[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | #[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | ||
| − | #Opening Statements | + | # Opening Statements |
| − | #*'''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] | + | #* '''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] |
| − | #*'''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] | + | #* '''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] |
#[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | #[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | ||
#[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | #[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | ||
| − | #Verdict | + | # Verdict |
| − | #*'''Mithridacy:''' [[Await a verdict on Venge-Rats v Urchin (Defence)]] | + | #* '''Mithridacy:''' [[Await a verdict on Venge-Rats v Urchin (Defence)]] |
| − | #*'''Kataleptic Toxicology:''' [[Bribe the Venge-rats with a little of their own favourite tipple]] | + | #* '''Kataleptic Toxicology:''' [[Bribe the Venge-rats with a little of their own favourite tipple]] |
===Gondoliers=== | ===Gondoliers=== | ||
Maximum {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case}} of 9, requiring either 18 {{IL|Mithridacy}} and either {{IL|The Efficient Commissioner's Tale}} 1000 or {{IL|The Flower from Hell that Grows Under Your Skin}} for maximum payout. | Maximum {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case}} of 9, requiring either 18 {{IL|Mithridacy}} and either {{IL|The Efficient Commissioner's Tale}} 1000 or {{IL|The Flower from Hell that Grows Under Your Skin}} for maximum payout. | ||
| Line 661: | Line 660: | ||
#Start at 2 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | #Start at 2 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | ||
#[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | #[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | ||
| − | #Opening Statements | + | # Opening Statements |
| − | #*'''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] | + | #* '''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] |
| − | #*'''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] | + | #* '''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] |
#[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | #[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | ||
#[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | #[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | ||
| − | #Verdict | + | # Verdict |
| − | #*'''Mithridacy:''' [[Await a verdict on Gondoliers v Society Matron (Defence)]] | + | #* '''Mithridacy:''' [[Await a verdict on Gondoliers v Society Matron (Defence)]] |
| − | #*'''Kataleptic Toxicology:''' [[Bribe the enraged Gondoliers with the sweet taste of retribution]] | + | #* '''Kataleptic Toxicology:''' [[Bribe the enraged Gondoliers with the sweet taste of retribution]] |
===Tomb-Colonists=== | ===Tomb-Colonists=== | ||
Maximum {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case}} of 9, requiring 17 {{IL|Mithridacy}}, 12 {{IL|A Player of Chess}}, a {{IL|Charter of the Great Hellbound Railway|Appearance=Hell Charter}} and either {{IL|The Efficient Commissioner's Tale}} 1000 or {{IL|The Flower from Hell that Grows Under Your Skin}} for maximum payout. | Maximum {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case}} of 9, requiring 17 {{IL|Mithridacy}}, 12 {{IL|A Player of Chess}}, a {{IL|Charter of the Great Hellbound Railway|Appearance=Hell Charter}} and either {{IL|The Efficient Commissioner's Tale}} 1000 or {{IL|The Flower from Hell that Grows Under Your Skin}} for maximum payout. | ||
| Line 698: | Line 697: | ||
#Start at 1 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | #Start at 1 {{IL|Prestige of a Legal Case|Appearance=Prestige}} | ||
#[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | #[[Craft a water-tight case]] or [[Form a working understanding of the particulars]] | ||
| − | #Opening Statements | + | # Opening Statements |
| − | #*'''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] | + | #* '''With {{IL|An Assuming Judge}}''': [[Bring on the most rigorous judge]] |
| − | #*'''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] | + | #* '''Otherwise:''' [[Engage in a spot of witness intimidation]] |
#[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | #[[Explore the full legal complexity of the case]] | ||
#[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | #[[Dismantle the arguments of the opposing counsel]] | ||
| − | #Verdict | + | # Verdict |
| − | #*'''Mithridacy:''' [[Await a verdict on Tomb-Colonists v Hell (Defence)]] | + | #* '''Mithridacy:''' [[Await a verdict on Tomb-Colonists v Hell (Defence)]] |
| − | #*'''Kataleptic Toxicology:''' [[Bribe the furious Tomb-Colonist with the sweet taste of revenge]] | + | #* '''Kataleptic Toxicology:''' [[Bribe the furious Tomb-Colonist with the sweet taste of revenge]] |
==Analysis== | ==Analysis== | ||
