Editing Railway Board (Guide)
From Fallen London Wiki
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
==Optimizing for Echoes: Boomeranging the Tentacled Entrepreneur== | ==Optimizing for Echoes: Boomeranging the Tentacled Entrepreneur== | ||
− | Crafting your board for optimal use of [[Vote a dividend to the shareholders]] creates one of the most efficient sources for Echoes in the game - up to '''8.2 EPA''' when set up perfectly. | + | Crafting your board for optimal use of [[Vote a dividend to the shareholders]] creates one of the most efficient sources for Echoes in the game - up to '''8.2 EPA''' when set up perfectly. |
The requirements are: | The requirements are: | ||
− | * Not having a Worker Ownership Charter<ref>If you already have one, this just gets less efficient.</ref>, if possible | + | * Not having a Worker Ownership Charter<ref>If you already have one, you're not completely hosed; this just gets less efficient.</ref>, if possible |
* [[Train Luxuries]] at their maximum level | * [[Train Luxuries]] at their maximum level | ||
* Moral flexibility, particularly in regards to the Tentacled Entrepreneur's feelings; alternatively a dislike for the Rubbery Men | * Moral flexibility, particularly in regards to the Tentacled Entrepreneur's feelings; alternatively a dislike for the Rubbery Men | ||
Line 266: | Line 266: | ||
* Return to the beginning | * Return to the beginning | ||
− | Doing the same with [[Board Member: the Gracious Widow|the Gracious Widow]] is possible, but is less worth it. This is because you will eventually have to deal with the [[Rising Reports of Banditry|consequences of your actions]] in raising your {{IL|Seeing Banditry in the Upper River|Appearance=Upper River Banditry}} too high, and there is no profitable way to efficiently deal with the consequences of high banditry. [[Board Member: His Amused Lordship|His Amused Lordship]] can also be boomeranged, but he only reduces Debt by 10 CP, making him strictly worse than the Tentacled Entrepreneur. | + | Doing the same with [[Board Member: the Gracious Widow|the Gracious Widow]] is possible, but is less worth it. This is because you will eventually have to deal with the [[Rising Reports of Banditry|consequences of your actions]] in raising your {{IL|Seeing Banditry in the Upper River|Appearance=Upper River Banditry}} too high, and there is no profitable way to efficiently deal with the consequences of high banditry. On the other hand, [[Board Member: His Amused Lordship|His Amused Lordship]] can also be boomeranged, but he only reduces Debt by 10 CP, making him strictly worse than the Tentacled Entrepreneur. |
===Difficulty modifier analysis=== | ===Difficulty modifier analysis=== | ||
Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
*{{IL|Board against Own Financial Interests|5 x}} - becomes 8 x on the second vote if you started with no {{IL|In Corporate Debt|Appearance=Corporate Debt}}. | *{{IL|Board against Own Financial Interests|5 x}} - becomes 8 x on the second vote if you started with no {{IL|In Corporate Debt|Appearance=Corporate Debt}}. | ||
*{{IL|Board against the Bazaar|5 x}} | *{{IL|Board against the Bazaar|5 x}} | ||
− | *{{IL|Board against Labour|10 x}} if you don't have a {{IL|Charter of the Great Hellbound Railway|Appearance=Worker Ownership Charter}}. | + | *{{IL|Board against Labour|10 x}} if you don't have a {{IL|Charter of the Great Hellbound Railway|Appearance=Worker Ownership Charter}}. Note that having such a Charter reduces your profits and '''cannot be undone'''. |
Booting the Entrepreneur then adds these: | Booting the Entrepreneur then adds these: | ||
Line 286: | Line 286: | ||
Members who do not give us any difficulties at all on the five aforementioned issues include: | Members who do not give us any difficulties at all on the five aforementioned issues include: | ||
− | *{{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}} - Bears special mention here since although his {{IL|Persuasive}} check on dividends might not reach 100%<ref>Due to the small size of this board | + | *{{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}} - Bears special mention here since although his {{IL|Persuasive}} check on dividends might not reach 100%<ref>Due to the small size of this board reducing his potential difficulty malus.</ref>, he will always be glad to [[Vote the Tentacled Entrepreneur off the Board|vote out the Tentacled Entrepreneur]] with a free 100% check if you get his vote first as you usually would. If you are fortunate enough to have a {{IL|Portable Fingerking Moot}} from {{FontHallowmas}} then the Contrarian actually becomes a top-tier Board Member since you will get an auto-pass from him with that item. Sadly the Moot is likely to be {{FontFate}}-locked most Hallowmases. |
*{{IL|Board Member: September|Short=yes}} - Needs to be {{IL|Balmoral's Castellan}}. He puts up no objections to any part of this money-laundering scheme, presumably because he's perfectly happy to fleece the Brits, capitalists, and British capitalists for all they're worth. | *{{IL|Board Member: September|Short=yes}} - Needs to be {{IL|Balmoral's Castellan}}. He puts up no objections to any part of this money-laundering scheme, presumably because he's perfectly happy to fleece the Brits, capitalists, and British capitalists for all they're worth. | ||
*{{IL|Board Member: the Gracious Widow|Short=yes}} - Although she normally has financial concerns, voting for dividends imposes {{IL|Board against the Bazaar|5 x}}, which combined with her anti-Bazaar stance of -20 actually cancels out, allowing for an easy 100% check. | *{{IL|Board Member: the Gracious Widow|Short=yes}} - Although she normally has financial concerns, voting for dividends imposes {{IL|Board against the Bazaar|5 x}}, which combined with her anti-Bazaar stance of -20 actually cancels out, allowing for an easy 100% check. | ||
Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
===Acceptable accomplices=== | ===Acceptable accomplices=== | ||
− | As you can see, there are unfortunately not a lot of options for guaranteeing your success here, so we must work with the other, less optimal Board Members. In many cases, Persuasive checks are pegged to 200, meaning that you need {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100% auto-pass them. | + | As you can see, there are unfortunately not a lot of options for guaranteeing your success here, so we must work with the other, less optimal Board Members. In many cases, Persuasive checks are pegged to 200, meaning that you need {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100% auto-pass them. |
− | |||
*{{IL|Board Member: July|Short=yes}} {{FontFate}} - She requires {{IL|Memory of a Tale|12 x}} to buy, which is to say ''twelve'' Exceptional Stories.<ref>Please don't spend this much money if you can't afford to!</ref> Beyond the sheer cost, her raw {{IL|Persuasive}} check is 200 instead of 100 like other Board Members, meaning that you would need {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100% her checks anyway. At least it doesn't get worse? | *{{IL|Board Member: July|Short=yes}} {{FontFate}} - She requires {{IL|Memory of a Tale|12 x}} to buy, which is to say ''twelve'' Exceptional Stories.<ref>Please don't spend this much money if you can't afford to!</ref> Beyond the sheer cost, her raw {{IL|Persuasive}} check is 200 instead of 100 like other Board Members, meaning that you would need {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100% her checks anyway. At least it doesn't get worse? | ||
*{{IL|Board Member: The Hell-Scarred Gondolier|Short=yes}} - He might be perfectly fine with the dividends half of this scheme... but his inexplicable preference for the status quo<ref>How can someone support the status quo and Revolutionaries simultaneously, anyway?</ref> impedes his willingness to remove the Tentacled Entrepreneur. | *{{IL|Board Member: The Hell-Scarred Gondolier|Short=yes}} - He might be perfectly fine with the dividends half of this scheme... but his inexplicable preference for the status quo<ref>How can someone support the status quo and Revolutionaries simultaneously, anyway?</ref> impedes his willingness to remove the Tentacled Entrepreneur. | ||
*{{IL|Board Member: His Amused Lordship|Short=yes}} - HAL is entirely happy to give the Tentacled Entrepreneur the boot, which works here. But he gets squirrelly when it comes to voting for dividends due to his financial concerns, and this actually gets ''worse'' than 334 the second time round. | *{{IL|Board Member: His Amused Lordship|Short=yes}} - HAL is entirely happy to give the Tentacled Entrepreneur the boot, which works here. But he gets squirrelly when it comes to voting for dividends due to his financial concerns, and this actually gets ''worse'' than 334 the second time round. | ||
− | *{{IL|Board Member: The Dauntless Temperance Campaigner|Short=yes}} - Although she costs {{IL|Moon-Pearl|1000 x}} to bring on, she is actually quite amenable to our goal here, being similar to HAL in that she is fine removing the | + | *{{IL|Board Member: The Dauntless Temperance Campaigner|Short=yes}} - Although she costs {{IL|Moon-Pearl|1000 x}} to bring on, she is actually quite amenable to our goal here, being similar to HAL in that she is fine removing the Rubber from the premises but also a bit flaky when it's time to vote for dividends. However unlike HAL, DTC's concerns are with the Bazaar, but that concern does not grow with the second vote for dividends, leaving her {{IL|Persuasive}} check at "merely" 200. Which results in needing the usual {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100%. |
− | *{{IL|Board Member: Feducci|Short=yes}} - | + | *{{IL|Board Member: Feducci|Short=yes}} - The Dog of the Presbyter<ref>Apparently also a Dog of the Bazaar if his concerns here are to be believed.</ref> is essentially the DTC with a {{IL|Dangerous}} check instead, of which you will need 334 to 100% for the dividends. |
*{{IL|Board Member: The Viscountess of the Viric Jungle|Short=yes}} - Although she might seem like a good deal given that she only has a modifier of 10 for Financial and Status Quo, that still makes her HAL-shaped. Despite stating that she is not fond of the Tentacled Entrepreneur, she will actually ''oppose'' votes for his removal with a check that requires {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100%, and then hit you with it again for the dividends on both counts. This being said, if you want to use your train for Parabolan Warfare, she's an instant pass for that, so maybe you'll make that tradeoff. (Unless you already have the {{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}} on your board, in which case her automatically siding with you for that issue will make JC's {{IL|Persuasive}} check harder, making her not worth it.<ref>Unless you ''also'' have the aforementioned {{IL|Portable Fingerking Moot|Appearance=Moot}} to make ''that'' a non-consideration.</ref><ref>Though the presence of the Viscountess raises the difficulty of the Moot's Mithridacy check, that skillcheck is purely ornamental and does not affect the mechanical outcomes whatsoever. Bloody complicated game.</ref>) | *{{IL|Board Member: The Viscountess of the Viric Jungle|Short=yes}} - Although she might seem like a good deal given that she only has a modifier of 10 for Financial and Status Quo, that still makes her HAL-shaped. Despite stating that she is not fond of the Tentacled Entrepreneur, she will actually ''oppose'' votes for his removal with a check that requires {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100%, and then hit you with it again for the dividends on both counts. This being said, if you want to use your train for Parabolan Warfare, she's an instant pass for that, so maybe you'll make that tradeoff. (Unless you already have the {{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}} on your board, in which case her automatically siding with you for that issue will make JC's {{IL|Persuasive}} check harder, making her not worth it.<ref>Unless you ''also'' have the aforementioned {{IL|Portable Fingerking Moot|Appearance=Moot}} to make ''that'' a non-consideration.</ref><ref>Though the presence of the Viscountess raises the difficulty of the Moot's Mithridacy check, that skillcheck is purely ornamental and does not affect the mechanical outcomes whatsoever. Bloody complicated game.</ref>) | ||
+ | =====A brief word about Parabolan Train deployment===== | ||
+ | Proposing deploying your Train in your campaign imposes {{IL|Board against the Bazaar|10 x}} and depending upon your choice of campaign {{IL|Board against the Status Quo|10 x}}, {{IL|Board for the Fingerkings|2 x or 7 x}}, and/or {{IL|Board against the Shuttered Palace|5 x}}. Combining these concerns with our Dividends strategy here limits our board choices even further. | ||
− | + | To put it shortly, aside from the {{IL|Board Member: The Viscountess of the Viric Jungle|Short=yes}} (who auto-votes for you) none of the "Acceptable Accomplices" are likely to play nicely with you for this sort of proposal. Therefore you have two choices for board composition: | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*All four preferred board members: {{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}}, {{IL|Board Member: September|Short=yes}}, {{IL|Board Member: the Gracious Widow|Short=yes}}, {{IL|Board Member: The Drummer|Short=yes}} | *All four preferred board members: {{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}}, {{IL|Board Member: September|Short=yes}}, {{IL|Board Member: the Gracious Widow|Short=yes}}, {{IL|Board Member: The Drummer|Short=yes}} | ||
*{{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}} with {{IL|Portable Fingerking Moot}} for an easy auto-pass, {{IL|Board Member: The Viscountess of the Viric Jungle|Short=yes}} who autovotes for you, and your choice of two from the remaining preferred board members. | *{{IL|Board Member: Jovial Contrarian|Short=yes}} with {{IL|Portable Fingerking Moot}} for an easy auto-pass, {{IL|Board Member: The Viscountess of the Viric Jungle|Short=yes}} who autovotes for you, and your choice of two from the remaining preferred board members. | ||
Line 315: | Line 311: | ||
Some options may seem attractive at a glance, but should not be taken: | Some options may seem attractive at a glance, but should not be taken: | ||
− | * {{IL|Board Member: Furnace Ancona|Short=yes}} and {{IL|Board Member: Cornelius|Short=yes}} - Although their "boardnukes" might seem attractive, their Labour ties make them unreasonably difficult to convince for dividends<ref> | + | * {{IL|Board Member: Furnace Ancona|Short=yes}} and {{IL|Board Member: Cornelius|Short=yes}} - Although their "boardnukes" might seem attractive, their Labour ties make them unreasonably difficult to convince for dividends<ref>unless you already kneecapped your earning potential with a Worker charter beforehand</ref>, and more importantly {{IL|Queen Mate}}s and {{IL|Epaulette Mate}}s cost more actions to acquire than you'd save by using them. |
*{{IL|Board Member: Rubbery Yes-Man|Short=yes}} {{FontFate}} - He'll happily agree to everything... other than booting the Tentacled Entrepreneur, which he ''hates'', to the tune of a Persuasive '''250''' check.<ref>What's the point of even having a Yes-man if he won't yes one of the most profitable things you can do on the Board?</ref> | *{{IL|Board Member: Rubbery Yes-Man|Short=yes}} {{FontFate}} - He'll happily agree to everything... other than booting the Tentacled Entrepreneur, which he ''hates'', to the tune of a Persuasive '''250''' check.<ref>What's the point of even having a Yes-man if he won't yes one of the most profitable things you can do on the Board?</ref> | ||
− | *{{IL|Board Member: The Implacable Detective|Short=yes}} - Although she's perfectly happy to send the | + | *{{IL|Board Member: The Implacable Detective|Short=yes}} - Although she's perfectly happy to send the Rubber off to Board Jail, on the financial side she's a version of HAL that you can never influence with your {{IL|Respectability Factor}}. After the {{IL|Persuasive|334}} to 100% the first time, you would need ''{{IL|Persuasive|434}}'' to 100% the second dividend. Does she know about our money laundering scheme here? Is this a sting operation? |
− | *{{IL|Board Member: The Wandering Gondolier|Short=yes}} - Pro-Labour and Pro-Rubbery by preference for the status quo makes him not a good choice overall. This being said, you could always just tell him to [[Board Member: The Hell-Scarred Gondolier|go to hell]].<ref>If you are only concerned with this specific profit scheme, this arguably improves his disposition.</ref> | + | *{{IL|Board Member: The Wandering Gondolier|Short=yes}} - Pro-Labour and Pro-Rubbery by preference for the status quo makes him not a good choice overall. This being said, you could always just tell him to [[Board Member: The Hell-Scarred Gondolier|go to hell]].<ref>If you are only concerned with this specific profit scheme, this arguably improves his disposition.</ref> (Alas, if you then make the mistake of turning the Hell-Scarred Gondolier back into his normal Wandering version, [[Encourage the Wandering Gondolier to enter Hell|then you will have to wait until you build your last Railway station to make him Hell-Scarred again.]]) |
*{{IL|Board Member: The Bishop of Southwark|Short=yes}} - Wandering Gondolier Mk. II, except he's already been to Hell and it did not improve his disposition in the slightest. | *{{IL|Board Member: The Bishop of Southwark|Short=yes}} - Wandering Gondolier Mk. II, except he's already been to Hell and it did not improve his disposition in the slightest. | ||
*{{IL|Board Member: The Delightful Reverend|Short=yes}} - Southwark strikes back, except instead of being Pro-Labour he's Pro-Financial, which is only slightly better for dividend voting (+5/+8 for Financial vs +10 for Labour). | *{{IL|Board Member: The Delightful Reverend|Short=yes}} - Southwark strikes back, except instead of being Pro-Labour he's Pro-Financial, which is only slightly better for dividend voting (+5/+8 for Financial vs +10 for Labour). | ||
*{{IL|Board Member: April|Short=yes}} - If you wanted profit, why on earth would you want a Labour and Anarchist sympathizer who is impossible to influence by any means whatsoever?<ref>One would think that fleecing the Bazaar would appeal to her, but apparently not.</ref> | *{{IL|Board Member: April|Short=yes}} - If you wanted profit, why on earth would you want a Labour and Anarchist sympathizer who is impossible to influence by any means whatsoever?<ref>One would think that fleecing the Bazaar would appeal to her, but apparently not.</ref> | ||
− | *{{IL|Board Member: January|Short=yes}} - For all the Liberation and Revolution she gets up to, when she's on the Board she is not (openly) January the revolutionary. She is playing the role of a Respectable ex-Dean of Benthic, and so she argues for the Status Quo and Financial Interests, | + | *{{IL|Board Member: January|Short=yes}} - For all the Liberation and Revolution she gets up to, when she's on the Board she is not (openly) January the revolutionary. She is playing the role of a Respectable ex-Dean of Benthic, and so she argues for the Status Quo and Financial Interests, kneecapping both the boomerang and the dividends. |
[[Category:Guides]] | [[Category:Guides]] |